|
EM: How do you decided to display your art in a show/gallery? I sense that the display is as important as your art itself?
MIKE: First, we look at the space and compare to the art we prepared for the show. Then we kinda find the pieces that go well beside each other, and then we paint the walls. Paint the compositional shapes onto the wall to break up the space, and then that acts as a backdrop for a piece to go on. Most of time, we don't like putting pieces on a blank white wall, because we see so much potentials of what you can with a wall. But I like the white space in galleries as well, but we are just fascinated with flattening angular space, like making a round curve go across the corner, so it messes up your eyes, and it flattens that corner. Another thing is that we are really fascinated with outdoor environmental placement, Almost in a way we are creating that indoor.
EM: Yeah, that relates to the next question. Do you think your indoor art, as in gallery exhibitions, is an extension of your street/outdoor art?
MIKE: We take materials, found objects and bring them inside, nostalgic to outdoor art, I guess. There is a whole bunch of people doing that. It's not like we are doing any next shit, but there is a way we do our indoor art by incorporating the outdoor looking stuff, but not sacrificing integrity of outdoor stuff, so we let it be known that it is in a gallery, and it is in a totally different arena, but we like to have it rough just like the outdoor. I don't think it's right to take exactly what you do in public/outdoor forum and put it into a gallery, like doing a graffiti piece on canvas and putting in a gallery. Because it is like allowing the gallery to make money off an art work that they would consider trash or shun if it was on the side of their building, and it is ok now because it is in a gallery and on a pretty canvas.
EM: Are your parents artists?
MIKE: My mom is. She makes clay dolls. She always drew since I can remember. She was definitely a inspiration to me when I was younger.
EM: What do you think about commercialization of Graffiti and street art in general?
MIKE: In certain areas, it can be good because I'd rather see that if it's done properly than some cheesy stale design. I think a lot of graffiti influenced art has a nice design aesthetic that other people can't achieve. So certain companies that are somewhat affiliated with or come from that area(graffiti) can profit off of it, but not exploit it.
EM: What aspects of street art that interests you?
MIKE: Just the fact that you can interupt someone's life with an accent on the street, and that they won't know anything about it when they see it, but they might reflect on their own lives or even learn little about the artist who've created it. It might shock some sense into people, and it might get them out of their daily monotonous routine. Graffiti was what started me to be interested in the streets.
EM: Is it excited for you to create it(in the street)? Is that part of why you do it?
MIKE: Yeah, I mean it's somehow addictive. You just keep going back even if the piece gets painted over it. You don't let it get you bummed out. Maybe you get disturbed for a sec, but then you do it again, and put up more stuff.
EM: Street art could be transient, as in it could be gone the next day.
MIKE: Yeah, it's temporary, and that's probably what I like about it.
EM: Yeah, I think that's why it's problematic when you put a graffti piece in a gallery because that transient quality is gone once it's in that space.
MIKE: Yeah, you've taken away that temporary aspect of street art. If you see it on the street, then you take a photo of it because that's what all you gonna have, and that's why it's so valuable. I want people to understand what we(HUMAN FIVE) do is not graffti. Graffti started as one thing, and we are motivated by the act of putting art in the street. |